To download AHV because the AOS bundle includes an AHV installation bundle.It uses GitHub Releases as the source of an application’s updates, allowing the entire application and its workflow to be contained within GitHub. It ended with JavaScript developers around the world crying out in frustration as hundreds of projects suddenly stopped working—their code failing because of broken dependencies on modules that a developer removed from the repository over a policy dispute.Nutanix and its OEM partners install some software on a node at the factory. If you already use Office on a PC or iPad, you will find yourself right at home in Office 2016 for Mac.It all started with a request from the developers of a messaging application to an open source developer to change the name of a library. The new versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and OneNote provide the best of both worlds for Mac users - the familiar Office experience paired with the best of Mac. Microsoft Office 2016 - Unmistakably Office, designed for Mac.The incident is, however, prompting Schlueter and the team at npm Inc. But many developers are less than elated by the fact that code they've become dependent on can be pulled out from under them without any notice.The disruption caused by the wholesale unpublishing of code modules by their author Azer Koçulu was repaired in two hours, Schlueter told Ars, as other developers filled in the holes in the repository. Built on a 2016 MacBook Pro with 4 physical cores.At the center of it all is npm, Inc., the Oakland startup behind the largest registry and repository of JavaScript tools and modules. Isaac Schlueter, npm's creator, said that the way the whole thing shook out was a testament to how well open source works—another developer replaced the missing link quickly. It will bundle the entry file and output it to.
Package Node App 2016 Code Failing BecauseKoçulu registered modules for the project on npm. Kik in the assThe roots of the problem were in a project Koçulu, a prolific developer of open source JavaScript libraries and a longtime unofficial evangelist for npm, had launched on npm called "kik"—a command-line tool and library for "kick-starting" the setup of development projects, including their Git remote repository. And this week, it suddenly didn't. And npm, Inc., which aims to make revenue off private registries, treats the global public registry as an editorial product—a product that many developers have become dependent on to tap into a vast, automatically updated collection of open source code.It's an arrangement that has worked well, largely—except when it doesn't. Node.js uses npm as its default "package manager" for installing software, much as Linux distributions use apt-get.While the tools for npm are open source, the global public registry that it taps into is the service of a private company with venture capital backing. ![]() He sent several e-mails to npm, asking the support team to intervene. Don't e-mail me back." After a final plea from Stratton, he answered, "Yeah, you can buy it for $30,000 for the hassle of giving up with my pet project for bunch of corporate dicks."At this point, Stratton and Kik pleaded with npm's support team to help straighten things out. Can we not come to some sort of a compromise to get you to change the name without involving lawyers?""Hahah, you're actually being a dick," Koçulu replied. ![]() Justify yourselfOne of those very large packages was Babel, the JavaScript "compiler"—a tool that cleans up and updates JavaScript code to match current standards. And he used that command, deleting 273 modules he had registered in npm (though he left the modules available through GitHub).In a post on Medium, Koçulu said, "This situation made me realize that NPM is someone’s private land where corporate is more powerful than the people, and I do open source because, Power To The People."And that is when the JavaScript hit the dependency fan. "The second email I got from NPM was the founder Isaac giving me a one-liner command that deletes all my stuff," he said in an e-mail. I think I have the right of deleting all my stuff from NPM."Koçulu told Ars that Schleuter sent him a command to do just that. If you don’t do it, let me know how do it quickly. Esp serial numberOne developer declared, "This kind of just broke the internet."Within ten minutes, as Schleuter describes in a blog post about the episode, developer Cameron Westland had stepped in and published a functionally equivalent version of left-pad. And at this point, lots of people started freaking out. Suddenly, thousands of developers saw their code failing. "'That's one of the things that's adding fuel to this fire," Scheluter acknowledged. "Extremely quickly, the community came together and fixed the issue." But he acknowledged that many people were still upset that it had been allowed to happen in the first place—that someone had been allowed to arbitrarily yank code out of the system and break theirs. "The open source community really was working—the system worked," he said. And the anger over the outage didn't end when everything was declared fixed.Schleuter said that the speed with which the holes created by Koçulu's unpublishing were filled demonstrated the power of the open source community around JavaScript. In doing so, I can see multiple ways in which the npm organization is much less involved with the work I produce. I’ve talked to others doing the same.I’m taking actions that demonstrate my loss of trust with this project. I’m actively taking steps to mitigate how much I depend on this project to be available, and at what point in my development process I make use of it. James Nadeau wrote a long separate comment on npm's GitHub portal, entitled "Should I trust npm?", in which he expressed concerns many had raised:(T)here has been a series of decisions, commitments, and actions that this project’s maintainers have taken that have eroded the trust of it's users.I can't trust that a package will always be available.I can't trust npm will keep a published package around.I can’t trust they will respect my actions of unpublishing something from npm.I can’t trust that project maintainers will at least listen to my concerns.I imagine the number of people taking a look at how much they trust, need, and depend on npm right now is huge. The discussion thread has not yet been unlocked. A discussion over a user request to kill npm's unpublish feature became heated, and when npm's command-line interface team lead Forrest L Norvell locked the discussion "because I want to have an evening away from this," it further fanned flames. And it certainly won't be the last. That's our number one focus." He said there were "some historical reasons for letting people unpublish" and that he didn't have any details yet on what changes would be made—nor would he speculate about what those changes would look like.This isn't the first time a developer has gotten angry with npm Inc.'s handling of the registry. Is "definitely taking a close look at how things work when you unpublish a package, and what we need to change there to facilitate the smooth operation of the JavaScript community. Quite the opposite.Is this what you want your community members to be thinking and doing right now?Schleuter said that npm Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorClyde ArchivesCategories |